Two legal authorities, Chief Okoi Obono-Obla, a former aide to the president, and Justice Osai Ahiakwo, a public affairs commentator, have raised concerns regarding the likelihood of the Supreme Court overturning its 2012 ruling on the contested 76 oil wells between Cross River and Akwa Ibom States.
Advertisements
Their opinions follow recent statements made by Cross River State Governor Bassey Otu, who disclosed during a media event three months ago that his administration was taking steps to recover the oil wells that were lost over ten years ago.
The governor’s comments generated significant discussion on social media and among the public, with some citizens urging the state government to approach the Supreme Court again to seek the annulment of the May 12, 2012 ruling in the pivotal case: Government of Cross River State vs. Government of Akwa Ibom State.
Supporters of this initiative have asserted that new evidence has surfaced, which they believe could provide a legitimate reason to revisit the case.
However, Chief Obono-Obla expressed skepticism about the Supreme Court’s willingness to reconsider its decision.
“While it is indeed possible for judgments made by the Supreme Court of Nigeria to be overturned, such requests are seldom granted. The authority to overturn a ruling is discretionary and is used sparingly by the court.”
He elaborated that in Nigerian law, new evidence can be grounds for overturning a judgment, but this requires meeting a very high standard.
He further explained, “To be successful, the applicant must demonstrate that the evidence is pertinent and significant.
“It must directly relate to the central issues of the case and be substantial enough to potentially change the outcome.
“Previously Unavailable Despite Efforts: The evidence must have been unattainable at the time of the original trial, even with reasonable diligence.
“Capable of Altering the Decision: If this evidence had been introduced during the initial proceedings, it could have influenced the verdict.”